Posts Tagged ‘graphs’

Iraq Faces a Mental Health Epidemic

Sunday, August 28th, 2011

Imagine if your house was damaged as a result of being bombed in a military war. Now imagine if your house was bombed three times within a matter of years. Or imagine seeing your family and neighbors lying wounded and dying in the street of your hometown. These are the sort of mental health issues that residents of Iraq have to learn to cope with everyday. The question then becomes “Is the country equipped to deal with an epidemic of people who are experiencing mental illness?”

Iraq’s mental health dilemma

Living Conditions in Iraq

According to Iraq’s psychiatric association, Iraq has a mere 100 psychiatrists that must provide mental health care for a population that borders on 30 million [see PDF from World Health Organization]. And, even though the war appears to be winding down, there are more and more citizens of Iraq seeking medical treatment for their mental health issues that are a direct result of the war. The reality is that Iraq’s ability to deal with the onslaught of mental health patients lacks greatly.

As a result of this gross imbalance, Iraqis are turning to self-medication as a means of coping with the trauma they have suffered. Prescription drug abuse is currently the number one substance abuse issue in Iraq, and it grows by the day.

Iraq’s mental health needs on the rise

The country’s largest mental health institution, Al-Rashad, has had an increase of 10 percent in the number of patients, and they’ve had to turn patients away. Al-Rashad is a government-funded facility, and is the only long-term mental health institution in Iraq.

As more and more citizens of Iraq search for help in dealing with their emotional and physical scars, it appears that the mental health community will struggle to find ways to help and accommodate them.

Why Fast Food Costs Less than Healthy Food

Sunday, July 31st, 2011

Congress, for years, has been influenced by special interest groups. That’s no surprise to most of us.  However, there is one particular congressional issue that is harming the health of millions of Americans: The Farm Bill. Although, in the past, the Farm Bill was ostensibly meant to help the small American farmer remain competitive in a global market, it has morphed into something entirely different. As a result, health care costs have skyrocketed, and the eating habits of Americans have gone downhill.

When one refers to “The Farm Bill,” it generally encompasses every bill passed by Congress since the 1965 Food and Agricultural Act. These bills have a very important influence on what children are fed in their school lunches. Each bill provides billions of dollars in subsidies – primarily to Corn, Soybean, Meat, and Dairy. On the other hand, fruit and vegetable farmers are given only 1% of the subsidies.

How Farm Policy Affects Public Health Care

The 2006-2007 Annual Report of the President’s Cancer Panel had this to say about the country’s farm policy: “Current agricultural and public health policy is not coordinated—we heavily subsidize the growth of foods (e.g., corn, soy) that in their processed forms (e.g., high fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated corn and soybean oils, grain-fed cattle) are known contributors to obesity and associated chronic diseases, including cancer.”

The result? Our government actively supports unhealthy eating through its subsidies. Corn is turned into high-fructose corn syrup, while meat and dairy provides a low-cost, high-fat staple at below market rates. Ultimately it means that a Big Mac costs less than a healthy salad, which contributes to a nationwide obesity epidemic. At the same time Agribusiness is most profitable producing high-yield feed crops, so the government is also influenced by the big dollars of Big Agriculture.

In 2008, the Fairness in Farm and Food Policy Amendment, would have drastically changed the status quo, but the bill was ultimately defeated because Democrats feared they would lose valuable seats in the 2008 Congressional Elections. It was quashed 117 to 309.

Congress, for years, has been influenced by special interest groups. That’s no surprise to most of us.  However, there is one particular congressional issue that is harming the health of millions of Americans: The Farm Bill. Although, in the past, the Farm Bill was ostensibly meant to help the small American farmer remain competitive in a global market, it has morphed into something entirely different. As a result, health care costs have skyrocketed, and the eating habits of Americans have gone downhill.

When one refers to “The Farm Bill,” it generally encompasses every bill passed by Congress since the 1965 Food and Agricultural Act. These bills have a very important influence on what children are fed in their school lunches. Each bill provides billions of dollars in subsidies – primarily to Corn, Soybean, Meat, and Dairy. On the other hand, fruit and vegetable farmers are given only 1% of the subsidies.

The 2006-2007 Annual Report of the President’s Cancer Panel had this to say about the country’s farm policy: “Current agricultural and public health policy is not coordinated—we heavily subsidize the growth of foods (e.g., corn, soy) that in their processed forms (e.g., high fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated corn and soybean oils, grain-fed cattle) are known contributors to obesity and associated chronic diseases, including cancer.”

The result? Our government actively supports unhealthy eating through its subsidies. Corn is turned into high-fructose corn syrup, while meat and dairy provides a low-cost, high-fat staple at below market rates. Ultimately it means that a Big Mac costs less than a healthy salad, which contributes to a nationwide obesity epidemic. At the same time Agribusiness is most profitable producing high-yield feed crops, so the government is also influenced by the big dollars of Big Agriculture.

In 2008, the Fairness in Farm and Food Policy Amendment, would have drastically changed the status quo, but the bill was ultimately defeated because Democrats feared they would lose valuable seats in the 2008 Congressional Elections. It was quashed 117 to 309.